Talia Rivera: Black Boys and Education

My son will be going into the 6th grade in September.  Like me, he is Black.

I am hastily looking for the right junior high school for him to attend. A school that fits who he is. Danny is very creative.  He spends most of his time taking old shoe boxes, jeans, water bottles, glue, and paint to create the most interesting messes. My son needs a school environment that’ll stimulate his inventiveness and style of learning; if not, he’ll be in deep trouble.

In The Trouble with Black Boys: The Role and Influence of Environmental and Cultural Factors on the Academic Performance of African American Males by Pedro A. Noguera, Ph. D, Professor in the Graduate School of Education at Harvard University states, “All of the most important quality of life indicators suggest that African American males are in deep trouble.”

Black men lead the nation in homicides, both as victims and perpetrators.

Black men have the fastest growing rate for suicide.

“For the last several years Black males have been contracting HIV and AIDS at a faster rate than any other segment of the population,” according to Noguera. 

Black men incarceration, conviction, and arrest rates are at the top of the charts in most states.

“Even as babies, Black males have the highest probability of dying in the first year of life, and as they grow older they face the unfortunate reality of being the only group in the United States experiencing a decline in life expectancy.”

Noguera’s research points out that “in the labor market, Blacks are the least likely to be hired, and in many cities, the most likely to be unemployed.”

In my pursuit to preclude my son from these indicators, I found a private school I thought might be a good fit. So I scheduled a tour.  I took the tour with a Caucasian husband and wife.

The school is beautiful.  There is a full art studio.  The paint from the students’ brushes smeared the tables; they look like masterpieces.                           

After the tour, the parents met separately with an admission counselor. 

The counselor asked, “What’s Danny like? What are his weaknesses?  His strengths?”

The counselor then proceeded to tell me about the admissions process. She got up from her seat and walked over to her desk.  She reached for a piece of paper then handed it to me.

“The financial aid application is due in a week,” she said.  “We’re strict about our financial aid deadline.”

I mused. Why did she presume I need financial aid? Was it because I was Black?

Did the Caucasian husband and wife who toured the school with me get the same talk and piece of paper?

Honestly, I was humiliated. I felt ashamed that I didn’t have the money to get my son the education he deserves.

Irrespective of what led her to believe I need financial aid, the truth is, I do.

The truth is: I need help so my son can raise above all the statistics waiting for him.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Audrey Jordan: Being Who You Are and Acting Accordingly

Along with reciprocity, at the top of Boston Rising’s list of values is integrity.  What do we mean by integrity?  Walking our talk, doing what we say we will do, speaking truth to power, being who we say we are.  As it relates to the question of values, integrity means having the courage of our convictions – acting consistently with our stated beliefs.  More than a list of phrases on a piece of paper, our values ought to be visible in our actions.

This sounds straightforward, but is not at all easy to do. It will require constant effort, learning and more effort.  I am reminded of the complexity involved in being who you are by a current best-selling book by Baratunde Thurston  called “How to Be Black.” With biting humor and witty story-telling, Thurston and his panel get beyond relentless stereotypes and explore the ironies and insights linked to the experience of being Black.  Clearly, living beyond stereotypes is not solely a challenge for Black people.  No doubt readers of Thurston’s book who are female, young, elderly, gay or some other label will be able to identify with the complexity of navigating halls of power and privilege with one’s integrity intact.  Being your enlightened self takes a lot of everyday intentionality!

During this Black History month while pondering our value of integrity and the struggles ahead, I am especially awed by the uncompromising courage of African American ancestors and their allies who marched and boycotted, and withstood fire hoses, police dogs, angry mobs and oppressive authorities – even lost their lives – demanding the rights to be the fully respected human beings.  “Sing a song, full of the faith that the dark past has taught us.  Sing a song full of the hope that the present has brought us.  Facing the rising sun of our new day begun, let us march on ‘til victory is won!”  Those powerful words from “Lift Every Voice and Sing,” pay tribute and are a constant reminder of from where we as a society have come.  Our ancestors are the models of how to be Black, how to be fully human, how to be authentic, how to live in integrity.

We have much hope at Boston Rising, even while we have our eyes wide open about the challenges inherent in striving toward our aspiration to contribute boldly to the elimination of intergenerational poverty in Boston.  We know that we will need to go forward with courage, intentionality and integrity.

Up We Go!

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Tiziana Dearing: The Very Poor, the Middle Class and the Real Economic Challenge of 2012

Originally published in the Huffington Post

The Republican presidential race is giving those of us focused on poverty a lot of fodder. The latest comes courtesy of Mitt Romney in Florida with his now-famous, if unfortunate, sound bite, “I’m not concerned about the very poor.” Romney complains that the quote was taken out of context. Even in context, it reveals a lack of understanding about key facts that we need to grasp if most Americans are going to be able to live the lives they want.

Here is Mr. Romney’s whole quote
.

I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America.

 

Let’s leave the implication that the very poor and very rich somehow aren’t “Americans” for another day. I don’t think Mitt Romney was saying he doesn’t actually care about the “very poor.” In fact, I believe he does care — as do most reasonable people. But he clearly doesn’t understand what “very poor” means, or how it relates to the middle class today.

To start, Romney has the “very poor” to “very rich” continuum sideways. It’s vertical, and he clearly sees it as horizontal. For those who don’t enjoy spatial relations, let me illustrate.

Imagine if Romney had said, “I’m not concerned about the very far Left because Reason A, and I’m not concerned about the very far Right because Reason B.” Those represent extremes on a horizontal continuum, running from the left to the right. Both ends are opposites, but the implication is that they are also equal in status. For some reason, each end is adequately taken care of, so one safely can focus on the middle.

Romney put the very poor and the very rich on just such a horizontal continuum. But they aren’t. They are on a vertical continuum that runs from bottom to top. And while being on the bottom of that continuum is opposite from being on top, it is definitely not equal. The social safety net at best keeps people from falling into desperation. So, no, both ends are not sufficiently taken care of that one safely can focus on the middle.

Second, Romney pits the poor against the middle class in a way that not only is unhelpful, but also shows a lack of understanding of the current American economic experience.

At Boston Rising, we think of all Americans as part of a single class. We call it the Rising Class. That’s not just some can’t-we-all-get-along platitude. It reflects our deep understanding of and commitment to the American Dream – in this country, you get the tools to rise, to be who you want to be and to make the life you want, and then it’s up to you. We all are part of the Rising Class. Historically, though, some of us have had better access to the tools for rising.

That’s where Romney’s understanding is flawed. The very poor are very experienced with barriers to rising. The truth for them is that the tools — things like education, an upwardly-mobile job, a decent social network, some savings — are hard to get a hold of, and hard to hold onto once obtained.

In this most recent economic crisis, large swaths of the middle class are sharing that same experience. It’s harder to put away some savings, get through high school and college, get a job that has a future, etc. Our social networks are weaker, and they are harder to rely on because everyone’s busy, everyone’s looking, and everyone is in the same leaky financial boat.

When Romney says he is focused on Americans, the heart of our country, and then says that’s the middle class but not the poor, he’s creating a false dichotomy. Those are all members of the Rising Class who can’t get a hold of the tools for rising. Our solutions should not focus on picking one over the other, making one more American or more important than the other. Our solutions should focus on restoring the basic building blocks of the American Dream and then making them accessible to as many people as possible. What is to our economy today as the GI Bill was to soldiers after World War II?

If we stop calling it sideways when it’s up and down, and if we focus less on class and more on Rising Class, we can get busy with the task at hand — restoring the conditions to participate in the American Dream. Ultimately, we could get a whole lot more members of the Rising Class who could become the very rich.

Then we could stop worrying about them. They probably really are OK.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tiziana Dearing: The Real Debate We Need

Originally published in the Huffington Post

Probably too much already has been made of Newt Gingrich’s meteoric re-rise to popularity during last week’s South Carolina primary. The world has moved on to Florida and the State of the Union. Still, the combination of cynicism and deflection Gingrich used in his celebrated (or notorious) debate appearances does us all a disservice, and needs to be examined more closely.

We all know Gingrich was a firebrand during the South Carolina debates. In particular, two iconic moments cast him as the red-meat political fighter that arguably catapulted him to the lead, and to primary victory. The first, his unapologetic indignation over John King’s question about his marital infidelities is far outside my wheelhouse. But the hay he made in his exchange with black debate moderator Juan Williams, when Williams pushed him about his comments on food stamps, couldn’t be more in the wheelhouse for someone focused on poverty. It was disingenuous and cynical in a way that hurts our ability to have a real conversation about security and stability for the poor and working poor.

We can get to disingenuous in a minute. Let’s start with cynical. Back on Jan. 6, Gingrich caused controversy by offering to go to the convention of the NAACP and “talk about why the African American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied with food stamps.” When Juan Williams asked Gingrich if he could understand how those comments and others he had made might be offensive to those in poverty in general, and to racial minorities in particular, Gingrich looked him in the eye and said, “No.”

Really?

I find that remarkable. Gingrich is running for president of all of the United States — that means poor and rich, black, white, brown and any other shade. One who aspires to represent our broad population ought to be able to read its various moods.

The comments also were cynical because someone of Gingrich’s intelligence can’t have missed the parallels between the old “welfare queen” language of the 1980s and this new “food stamp” language. Calling President Obama the food stamp president has a racial undertone to it — whether Gingrich intended that or not is unknowable. It still does. The struggle to make ends meet is not a racial issue: It’s an American issue. We experience it as one, and we need to tackle it as one – undivided.

Gingrich’s debate remarks about food stamps were also disingenuous. Let’s start with the facts about SNAP enrollment. (SNAP is the proper term today for “food stamps.”)

In many states, historically, woefully few families eligible for SNAP benefits were enrolled to receive them. As food insecurity among the poor and working poor increased in the U.S., ensuring people accessed a food security benefit already in place became a priority. Therefore, federal, state and local officials began pushing for dramatic increases in food stamps, and then SNAP enrollment before the 2008 recession.

Indeed, the Wall Street Journal itself noted that enrollment in SNAP went up by more than 50 percent during the administration of President George W. Bush. The New York Times reported in a 2009 article that “the Bush Administration led a campaign to erase the program’s stigma, calling food stamps ‘nutritional aid’ instead of welfare, and made it easier to apply.”

In my own state of Massachusetts, SNAP enrollment was up 73 percent over the five years prior in 2008. It must be noted that it was up 103 percent over the five years prior in 2010. Nationally, participation of eligible working poor families was at just 66 percent in 2007. Enrollment in 2009, however, was up 41 percent over the five years prior. These trends were the intersection of two patterns — increasing financial hardship and a multi-administration push to support struggling Americans with SNAP.

Reasonable people can disagree about the role of government in providing for the emergency and transitional needs of its citizens facing hardship. I believe that a support like SNAP, when coupled with strong supports to help Americans build assets and futures, can be a good role for government to play. There are other legitimate views on the role of government, however, and we need that debate badly now.

That the American people — including those unfairly stigmatized as “the poor” — are in need of some help, however, really can’t be argued. According to a late 2011 report by the Population Reference Bureau, nearly one in three working families in the United States is struggling to make ends meet:

Forty-six million people, including 23 million children, lived in low-income working families in 2010–an increase of 1.6 million people from the previous year. The number of children in low-income working families increased by more than 500,000 in just one year.

 

That brings us to the last reason Gingrich’s remarks were unfortunate. Gingrich is right that the trajectory for rising in this country is first to get a job, then get a better one, and then “own the job.” When he laments the lack of improvement in unemployment since the start of the recession, fair enough. Even Fareed Zakaria recently noted that it could take five years to get employment back to pre-recession levels.

Those economic challenges, the ones faced by the vast majority of people in the U.S. of all races — people who want to get ahead and be in America’s Rising Class but can’t get their hands on the tools for rising — are what we should be discussing in 2012. And we should be doing so united, not divided.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Audrey Jordan: Insights on Reciprocity

A recent conversation with a valued colleague, Imari Paris Jeffries, helped me to understand the difference between equilibrium and balance.  Before having this discussion, I thought of these two concepts as pretty much the same thing.  But as he explained it, he used the analogy of sharing the responsibilities in a healthy marriage.  Balance is where one spouse agrees to cook the meals three nights, the other three nights, and both do the meals together the other day that is left.  The task split right down the middle — mathematically equal.  Equilibrium factors in context, interest, relative convenience.  It would be where one spouse might do all the meals (because they agree that one is the better cook), the other spouse takes care of the bills (because they agree that one is better at keeping the accounts balanced); then every now and then one spouse agrees to spring for dinner to give the spouse that cooks a break; the other spouse might agree to pay an accountant to get the taxes done during tax season to give the one who keeps the accounts a well-deserved break.  What is the difference between balance and equilibrium?  Balance is keeping score, equilibrium (a much more dynamic process), is keeping the focus on harmony and growth in the relationship, and the relationship feels better for all concerned – which is the point of all the sharing of the load in the first place.

As I consider reciprocity — the give-get principle at the heart of Boston Rising’s vision of co-investment — equilibrium, not balance has to be the spirit that underlies the exchanges.  Each gives what each is capable of giving while taking when the need arises.  If the spirit is that in our giving and taking  it is all about bettering ourselves to help better ours and others’ circumstances — to strengthen our relationships, our network, and our community so we all can rise — then it will be so.  And we all grow in strength and pursuit of happiness.   This is the spirit I see as I see and participate in Boston Rising’s evolution and watch and help the work unfold.  I am not saying we have the balance right yet, and am sure that it will be an ongoing enterprise — I am saying it is not about the balance!   It is about equilibrium.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tiziana Dearing: Keeping the Faith

“Oh, you better watch out, you better not cry…”

“Teacher says, ‘Every time a bell rings, an angel gets its wings…’”

“Mom, how does Santa get around the fire in the fireplace without getting burned?”

“[Bleep] Santa.  He never brings us anything…”

Try to imagine these quotes coming at you over a radio dial.  As you tune up and down, they fade in and out.  The first is from the song Santa Clause Is Coming to Town. The second is from the Jimmy Stewart film It’s A Wonderful Life.  The third is from my six year-old son, Jude, who has complete confidence in Santa but is quite anxious about St. Nick’s health and survival these days.  The fourth is from columnist Yvonne Abraham of The Boston Globe, citing the answer an eight year-old boy gave a school nurse in a Boston Public School when she cautioned him that bad behavior might cause Santa to put him on the naughty list.

Normally it would be nearly inexcusable to use that last quote.  It’s the kind of cheap, voyeuristic inclusion typically designed to help people jaded toward inner-city youth feel better about being jaded, while subtly reinforcing complex, bigoted stereotypes.  Abraham put it to reasonable use, however, to demonstrate the range of problems a school nurse can face at a challenged inner-city school.  I chose to deploy it to make a point about faith at Christmas time.  Not faith in God or Jesus Christ — faith in our adults and in our institutions.

This is the time of year when we as people put tremendous faith in the grown-ups and institutions around us.  Christians and Jews recount age-old stories of sacrifice, redemption and miracle.  We renew our faith commitments rooted in these stories.  Why? Because our religious leaders tell them to us and they resonate.   Children believe, beyond logic and evidence to the contrary, a tale about an old man who gets pulled in a glorified six-by-ten wagon all over the world by flying animals in order to deliver toys to the planet’s good girls and boys in a single night.  Why?  Because the adults in their lives told them it was true and they want to believe it. 

People give.  The embarrassment of riches that confronts our households at Thanksgiving and the December religious holidays, combined with the tax-based pressure to complete end-of-year giving, sharpen the focus.  People give to organizations that the rest of the year are painfully ignored, even mocked or pitied – those putting their own faith in poor and marginalized populations by supporting them and their dreams.   Why?  Because we believe in the need to create right relationships.  And, this time of year, we have will to believe the nonprofit organizations we support actually can help set things right.

We are right to put our faith in all these things. 

We put our faith in faith, and its institutions, because they help us figure out how to live together and with ourselves. We put our faith in the adults around us because to do otherwise would be to embrace chaos. We put our faith in nonprofits and like institutions because we know how badly we need them to do the work they do.

It is in this context that I quote the little boy.  What lies behind that quote is not some street thug, some cell-block resident in the making.  It’s a little boy – one whom life has convinced that he shouldn’t have faith in the adults and institutions around him.  The school nurse isn’t interested in his health.  She’s trying to keep him in line.  Mom and Dad aren’t going to take care of him.  That’s why he’s with the nurse in the first place.  And Santa?  Well, [bleep] Santa.

Let’s call ourselves to a special resolution in 2012.  Let’s be adults who deserve some faith.  Let’s run institutions people can believe in.  Let’s do the work – be it God’s, the people’s or the government’s – that puts relationships right again, and restores balance to our communities. 

Let’s be the adults and institutions, every day, that the little boy can believe in.  If we do it long enough, beyond logic and previous evidence to the contrary, he might believe in us.  Why?  Because he really, really wants to.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Bill Traynor: No One Rises Alone

Bill Traynor is the Co-Facilitator, with Frankie Blackburn, of the Connectivity Task Force at Boston Rising. The Task Force is staffed by Talia Rivera and includes Imari Paris Jeffries, Paul Johnson, Chrismaldi Vasquez, Alice Stein, Damon Cox and Brittany Parker

The New Marketplaces of the Rising Class

The Connectivity Task Force at Boston Rising ensures that relationship building is at the center of all aspects of our work and central to the goal of eradicating poverty in Boston.  I want to share some thoughts about how we see ‘connectivity’ in the context of the Rising Class.

Aspects of poverty that we experience in our own lives, and witness in the lives of others – economic, spiritual, emotional – those born of injustice and those born of isolation or fear – are the handiwork of a community that cannot imagine nor realize its interconnectedness. These communities are destined to be trapped in an ordeal of perpetual pain and distress – the evidence of which is the colossal investment that is made in things like insurance, health care, law enforcement, incarceration in the U.S.

The income and wealth disparity across our nation has yielded economic poverty for many and poverty of awareness, spirit and action for others. Greed, for instance, is born from fear and detachment. Aspiration is an impulse born from a sense of personal power and connection. Which of these dispositions contributed to the real estate/financial services debacle? Toxic assets can only be peddled in a toxic environment.

The Rising Class is a framing developed by Boston Rising and is based on the assumption that ending multi-generational poverty is completely doable if we clear the way for, and feed, the ambitions and aspirations that lie in the hearts and minds of all people, the “poor” being no exception. This idea is based on a few, surprisingly apparent, simple truths about Rising:

  • No one rises alone.
  • Relationships that span diverse networks create pivotal moments of opportunity in one’s life (e.g., professional and social networks).
  • Our interconnectedness as a community – for better or worse – is a fact, not just a lovely idea.
  • Class, power, race, geography, professionalism, paternalism, fear, bad habits these things cultivate poverty and promote isolation in every corner of our community.

The Rising Class provides an interesting usage of the term “class.”  Instead of seeing “class” as a socio-economic stamp, the identity of the Rising Class is rooted in a more universal condition. We can all Rise and we need all of us to Rise.  This spurs an entirely new dialogue, what is the truth about Rising? And a new call-to-action, connect-up, people!  

The Rising Class is interested in establishing deeper connections across a broad network. The expansive network of connections creates a vast and robust marketplace where value is exchanged and value becomes currency for building rapport, building a trusted space for exchange, and building community.

But in this assumption, the Rising Class has a problem. The world is not organized to facilitate this deeper and broader exchange – between the neighbor in 1A and the neighbor in 1B, the school principal and the parent, the Wellesley resident and the Grove Hall resident, the teen and the grandparent, the new immigrant and the old-timer, the homeowner and the renter.  And it is definitely not set-up to reach isolated and marginalized members of the community.  Instead, those experiencing poverty are offered help in exchange for control. They are not invited into the marketplace to explore their value. 

As a result, the Rising Class needs to build its own marketplaces, establishing new kinds of “trusted spaces” that are explicitly designed to confront barriers by offering:

  • New networks of relationships across differences,
  • Intentional ways of revealing hidden or suppressed value, and
  • New methods of, and spaces for, exchange.
  • Means of marshaling aggregate [market] power, in addition to collective power, as a way to effectuate change.

Neighbors who live next door to each other for years but don’t know each other and consequently have no exchanged value – not even the minimum needed to defend their street. These same neighbors who have met through a Boston Rising Neighbor Circle, who share dinner and life stories, and then look out for each other’s children, exchange favors, appreciate and smile at each other on the street, take on local issues together – these neighbors are exploring, revealing and exchanging value in a trusted space, the exact function of a marketplace. 

Families who come together through the Family Independence Initiative (FII) cohorts are invited to exchange help, networks, advice, favors and to offer each other opportunities and they do. In the process they are expanding the resource base to feed their own and others’ aspirations for jobs, homes, education and small business ventures.

Whether through a simple Neighbor Circle or the elegant FII approach, a small business accelerator space or neighborhood controlled trust fund to stimulate local connection and action, all these serve as early examples of the new marketplaces that the Rising Class demands; 21st Century trusted spaces where a deeper and broader exchange can take place, where value exchanges, and when new resources are unleashed. We need hundreds more of these examples, especially those kinds of trusted spaces that specialize in connecting people across different socio-economic backgrounds.  

This then is the life and work of the Rising Class – to engage in ‘rising acts,’ to create new trusted spaces for exchange, to push us all to a greater place as a community, all fueled the unleashing of the still great and powerful aspirational spirit of human beings as we strive to connect, contribute and rise.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Imari Paris Jeffries: Redefining Thanksgiving

My family and I have a tradition of taking “official” family pictures every Thanksgiving Holiday.  We pick a color for the year and the twelve members from three different family groups attempt to translate their family’s version of that color into a cool matching outfit extravaganza!  Past years colors have been green, hues of blue, white, with this year’s color being pink.  This process of posing in uncomfortable and artificial positions and poses becomes a comedy of sorts as we try to get a one, five, six, and eight-year old to cooperate for the “pretty pictures”. 

Many families have versions of the “pretty pictures” that come in the shape of school pictures, cheesy family pictures with fuzzy blue backgrounds, and the one hour old baby photos that have become new parent badge of honor with the newborn infant baby, smashed face and all wearing the white hospital wrap with red and blue stripes. 

Smile for the camera!  We all say.  Look up, look up! Everyone say cheese!  The process of posing for the camera, hamming it up for each other, and the gentle teasing as we search for our most photogenic side, takes the adults in the group back to our own childhood.  It is also part of the process of building memories for the next generation.  A throwback to simpler times when the Thanksgiving meal was the climax of the holiday followed by ceremonial watching of the “big game” as everyone tried to stay awake despite a serious case of the contagious food coma and where the biggest Thanksgiving to-do was pestering the crazy uncle or cousin who dared fall asleep in the corner after having one too many glasses of wine.

It was a time when the entire family being together meant everything.  We built up our histories and collective memories for each other.  It was an opportunity for thanks and connectedness. The best thing about Thanksgiving was Thanksgiving; the food, the family, and collective history making.

In the United States, the modern Thanksgiving holiday tradition traces its origins to a 1621 celebration at Plymouth in present-day Massachusetts. It marked the day of thanks that the early colonist celebrated with the Wampanoag Native Americans who helped the Pilgrims survive the rough life of the “new world” by providing seeds and teaching them to fish. To show honor and gratitude for this act of selflessness a great feast was hosted by the colonists in remembrance.

Last Thursday, millions of Americans gathered in the homes of family, friends, and loved ones.  Over turkey dinners, holiday hams, and sides and fixings all imaginable flavors and tastes Americans celebrated this day of thanks, harvest and celebration.  Somehow the modern equivalent to the day of harvest has been extended to Black Friday, where millions of Americans contributed to our struggling economy this weekend helping to break new records in the days following the Thanksgiving holiday, giving retailers, shop owners, and businesses hope for better profits in a year of mostly gloomy economic news.  The doom and gloom that has dominated the news since the 2008 recession.

Black Friday, as part of the elongated Thanksgiving Holiday has started earlier each year with stores opening from 10PM Thanksgiving evening as well as the standard 4-5 AM.  As with previous years the news is littered with stories of outrageous behavior in the name of finding the perfect gift for our loved ones.   This year, a woman in Los Angeles pepper sprayed a crowd waiting in line for X Box game systems.  Last year, three people sustained life threating injuries as they were trampled at their local discount box store to get the latest and greatest gift of the year.

Marshall Ganz stated in a recent interview in the Huffington Post that on the duality of the Occupy Movement, “One of the things that distinguishes social movements from interest group mobilization and so forth is that they’re transformational in two ways, or three ways, even. Social movements are cultural events, as well as economic and political events, and they involve a shift in self-understanding, community understanding, as well as expectations of political and economic institutions.”  Well it might be time to create another Occupy Movement.  It’s time to reclaim that duality that Thanksgiving has come to mean for many Americans pre-Black Friday extension.  This is not to overly romanticize this holiday and the tension it holds for many Native Americans in our country but rather acknowledge the duality of Thanksgiving as a cultural event that also involve shifts in our own understanding of self, our families, and their collective connectedness.  It’s time to reclaim Thanksgiving an occasion that we celebrate the present, the here and now, while remembering the past, honoring the warmth of our families. It is time to Occupy Thanksgiving and restore its soul, spirit, and camaraderie.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Audrey Jordan: The Value of Values

I was a participant in the Grantmakers for Effective Organizations conference out in San Francisco last month.  The conference, Growing Social Impact in a Networked World: A Grantmakers’ Gathering on Networks, was well-attended, a sign that the small network of funders who hosted the conference are finding resonance with many more funders concerning the power of networks for catalyzing change.  In the closing session the top three “ahas” or insightful takeaways for the 150 or so attendees were:  1) funders as more than investors but also benevolent catalysts; 2) trust-building comes through authentic relationships; 3) the value of values.   I think these are terrific insights for any group to take away, but especially for this group.  If taken beyond insights to calls to action, there is reason to believe that funder-community partnerships can and will change for the better, and real, lasting change in tough neighborhoods could actually happen. 

In this season of Thanksgiving, I am appreciative that at Boston Rising we’ve meaningfully taken on the values insight.  We know that it is too easy to say we believe in “co-investment,” or “integrity” or “reciprocity,” but what does it really look like in day-to-day practice, with each other and with our partners in communities?  Clear that values must be much more than adages on paper, we’re making our values visible, actionable, and consequential.  We’re not there yet, but we have committed the time, space and on-going effort to make our values the norms for our decisions and actions.  My blogposts will be an on-going report on our progress.  I hope you follow the posts and learn with us.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tiziana Dearing: Where Is the American Dream Today?

Originally published in the Huffington Post

I’m a big believer in convergence — those moments where the same idea or belief gets repeated in the fourth, fifth, or sixth different place and it tells you maybe that idea’s time is ripe. We have been experiencing just such a moment around the American Dream. More people are questioning whether the Dream is actually alive.

About 10 days ago, there was a national summit on the campus of Columbia University called Opportunity Nation. Spurred by Be The Change, an organization started by City Year founder Alan Khazei, and led by entrepreneur Mark Edwards, Opportunity Nation and its summit focused on building a nation-wide “Shared Plan to Restore Opportunity.” Throughout the day-long event, a number of people presented their “opportunity stories,” about how their families converted hard work, education and access to the American marketplace into a better future for themselves and their children. Each story was accompanied by an anxious question — sometimes asked by the speakers, and sometimes by the audience. Does that same opportunity exist for the poor in America today? What happened to the American Dream?

Meanwhile, on the other end of Manhattan, the Occupy Wall Street protests continued. As the picketers hoisted their daily lot of protest signs, Fareed Zakaria enlightened Summit attendees with some alarming data in his talk about “What happened to the American Dream?”

Zakaria noted that historically, the U.S. has had a set pattern of job recovery after coming out of a recession. From 1945 to 1990 it took, on average, six months for jobs to return to their pre-recession levels. But in the recession of the early 1990s, jobs took 15 months to return to pre-recovery levels. According to Zakaria, it took jobs 39 months to come back after the recession of the early 2000s. Today? “The current recession and recovery we are in, we are on track for the jobs to come back 60 months after the economy has recovered. So, that’s five years.” That’s especially disturbing given that there weren’t more than about six years total between those last two recessions.

I doubt the Occupy Wall Street protesters saw Zakaria’s speech. But it seems like the majority are trying to find a way to show that they know instinctively what Zakaria told us in so many words.

On November 3, the same day of the Opportunity Nation Summit kick-off, the Brookings Institute released a new report declaring that the poor in the U.S. grew to an historic high of 46.2 million over the last 10 years. Even more striking, the report noted that, “After declining in the 1990s, the population in extreme-poverty neighborhoods — where at least 40 percent of individuals live below the poverty line — rose by one-third from 2000 to 2005-09.” Then, they delivered the real American Dream kicker:

Compared to 2000, residents of extreme-poverty neighborhoods in 2005-09 were more likely to be white, native-born, high school or college graduates, homeowners, and not receiving public assistance. However, black residents continued to comprise the largest share of the population in these neighborhoods (45 percent), and over two-thirds of residents had a high school diploma or less.

Fast forward a week and go to Boston. The Boston Foundation released a report showing increasing income disparities between the city’s rich and poor. The study found that:

Households at or below poverty and those with very low educational attainment are concentrated in the Roxbury/Dorchester/Mattapan neighborhoods of Boston (Census PUMA 03303). With 42% of its children in poverty, this area represents Massachusetts’ largest concentration of child poverty.

How does Boston Foundation President and CEO Paul Grogan sum up this and the other poverty data he has released? “The American Dream, especially for inner-city families with children, is receding.”

Convergence. The poor are getting poorer. They are increasingly being isolated into ever-poorer neighborhoods, which makes it that much harder to break out. Jobs are not recovering with the recovery, and another recession could hit before they ever do. Our knowledge economy increasingly leaves behind people with poor educational attainment — a factor also correlated with poverty.

Convergence. Americans are no longer all dreaming the same Dream. Let’s all take the steps we must — in education quality and attainment, social safety net funding, job training, job availability, hard work, personal responsibility, innovation, savings — to keep the Dream alive for everyone.

Posted in In the News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment